From the historic perspective, the topic of voting is very controversial. On the
one hand, exists groups who believe in the importance of voting for the change.
Other groups believe that the vote is not good to the change. These two
perspectives are very apposed, because they are irreconcilable.
In this occasion I
won't vote for the mayor in my city hall, because it does not represent my political perspective . I think it is necessary propose candidates from the people, a candidate who represents the necessity of the people. Because generally the candidates proposed from the political parties to maintain the power.
My opinion for the
electoral campaigns is really unnecessary, it is much trouble for the view.
Besides it contaminates the ecosystem with the "palomitas". In fact it is a
trouble to the automobiles because they impede a good driving.
Currently I considerer myself a politician, but from my perspective, maybe someday I will be able to run for a political position, but
from the people, when the people consider me, when the community construct one
political program.
Finally I thinks it is necessary
to construct a really political life, because the vote does not represent the
democracy, the vote is one moment, it is required more politicial participation,
this change is necessary.
I agree with you on the "palomitas" and the pollution that it produces, it's sad ):
ResponderEliminar